I have the same scenario here, is it not possible to use the ultragrid1.rows.all.find() function to return the row? since we're resetting the grid, we can capture the field value from the grid prior to the reset.

Theres always the old fallback of looping through each row in the grid, but the Find method seems to be what we're looking for here, isnt it?

Um, I don't think so. I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure that the All property is a property on Collection and it just returns an Object array. I wasn't aware that there was a Find method on an Array, but even if there is, I assume it finds some object that you specify. I don't see how it would be able to find an UltraGridRow with a cell that has a particular value. It knows nothing about the grid or cells.  

 Mike, marcjannes, fergal1982

 I have this same requirement in my project.

 The .Find() method is a new LINQ extension for collections. However, because the .All property doesn't know that the items inside the RowsCollection object (UltraGrid1.Rows) are UltraGridRow objects, what seems to be syntactically correct is something like this ... 

       // get the row from the grid which represents the column for which the filter was modified.
       UltraGridRow colRow = this.ActiveGrid.Rows.OfType<UltraGridRow>().ToList().Find(row => row.Cells[0].Text.Equals(valueListColumnFiltersChangedEventArgs.Column.Name, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase));

• In the first bit, you want to explicitly get the objects inside the Rows collection that are of type UltraGridRow (Rows.OfType<UltraGridRow>)
• This sets us up for being able to convert to a List<UltraGridRow>, while also ensuring that the following conversion to a List, and finally the search using the predicate, don't fail if they come across an invalid type. (While I'm fairly confident this should have no problems with verifying the type, if it does cause problems you can perform an equivalent using: .Where(obj => obj is UltraGridRow) ... to get an IEnumerable collection of the rows. I would suspect the OfType is slightly more performant?).
  
• You can then use the.Find() method, supplying your predicate/function of choice.
• For me this happens inside an event which i raise from my BizObj when an item from a sub-collection is removed from the middle of the collection. (Each item in the sub-collection is displayed in the same row as the parent object, in unbound columns at the end of the grid.)
  
• Here you see the value of valueListColumnFiltersChangedEventArgs.Column.Name is compared to the text value inside the first column of the grid, which is read-only and used as the key (back to the BizObj) for the row. 

Nice, emz.  The LINQ approach works like a charm.

Thanks!

Thanks Mike - that's a great method - not sure when it was added, but I had totally missed it.

grid.Rows.GetAllFilteredInNonGroupByRows

<<< The LINQ approach works like a charm. >>>

Only if the grid is not grouped.

As far as I could tell the LINQ approach only works if the grid isn't grouped. There doesn't appear to be a method to get a list of all the UltraGridRow objects in a single query that I could figure out, that would work for a grouped grid.

Any reason why Infragistics couldn't provide a list of all of the UltraGridRow objects corresponding to all the rows in the data source? We are all having to reinvent the wheel by writing code to iterate throught the collection to get this information which is a common requirement for all of us - it sure would be nice if this was a standard method or property of the grid.