I have removed a column from my datasource. But the users have the column saved in their previous old layout preferences files which they saved earlier. As suggested in other posts I have loaded a new UltraGridLayout object with that file. I now want to remove the specific column from that layout by doing
layout.Bands[0].Columns.Remove(column);
But it is returning an error for can't change/remove bound column. The layout object is still not bound or loaded to any grid. How can I remove that specific column from the layout so that when I load it to the grid then it does not return a error?
Hi,
Well... it seems to me you have a couple of options. The smallest change for you to make would be to attach the DataFilters immediately after loading the layout.
Another approach would be to load the layout inside the InitializeLayout event and then attach the DataFilters immediately after that.
Ok the first problem will definitely be handled in some way out of the ones mentioned. For the second problem as you suggested that I should move it to the initialize layout event. The initialize layout event is called only when I assign the data source and not at the time when I am applying layout from the xml.
My sequence of applying various actions is:
1) Adding some extra columns to the datasource table.
2) Assigning the table as datasource to the grid.
3) Assigning default preferences in code like sorting etc.
4) Loading Layout from the xml.
The captions, exclude from columnchooser and applying datafilter is done in the initialize layout event.
Should I change the way I am doing things
Okay...
Puneet Earan said:See there are to different problems. First is I want to make sure if in future one of my column changes then how do I handle the formatting of the grid. What happens in such cases is:- lets say we have 4 columns ABCD we have some formatting for them saved in xml by the user. Now we have changed column B to E. Then the default formatting which I apply just before loading the layout is lost for the column E. And if I do the default formatting after loading then the user's formatting is overridden. So how do approach it.
There's no easy way to change the layout such that column E now occupies the same position and properties as column B did. You could do it manually, I suppose, by loading the layout into memory and storing it, then loading the layout into the grid and then manually copying all of the properties of B in the stored layout into column E in the grid. This would be a lengthy and difficult process, though, and I certainly wouldn't want to have to write that code.
Another possible approach would be to try to modify the XML and change the "B" to an "E". But I wouldn't recommend this either. I've never tried it and quite frankly I don't have any idea what kind of complications this might entail in terms of hooking up the related objects.
The approach that I have taken in the past is that whenever I make a change to my application that might cause the saved layouts on the user's machine to be invalid, I simply don't load them. The layout simply reverts to the default when the user runs the application and they have to rearrange things back the way they want them. This is not ideal, but realistically, there's no way you could possibly anticipate every possible case in order to merge one layout with another.
The way I achieved this is that I saved the layout into a stream and the first element in the stream is a version number. In the application I define a constant that represents the layout version. Any time I change something in the layout, I bump this version number. Whenever the layout is saved, this version number is the first thing into the stream. When I load the layout, I read the stream and load up the version number first. If the versions match, I load the layout. If they don't, I just skip and don't load anything.
Puneet Earan said:The other problem is when I am applying formatting on the grid then the datafilters on editors in columns are disabled and the data is not filtered. I have tried to handle it by assigning the datafilter after loading the layout but this causes it modify the data just after loading the grid which is visible if there is very large data.
DataFilters are not saved with the layout. They cannot be, because the DataFilter is an interface. So it's some object that implements that interface, and there's no way for the grid to serialize that object. Even if the object is serializable, the grid doesn't save it, because you could be implementing that interface on any object, just as the Form, and it would cause an infinite recursive loop for the grid to serialize the form, which contains the grid.
Typically, you would assign editors and DataFilters inside the InitializeLayout event.
I don't know what you mean when you say that assigning the DataFilters is changing the data. That sounds like a problem with your DataFilter, but I can't really guess without a lot more information and probably a sample.
Hi Mike,
See there are to different problems. First is I want to make sure if in future one of my column changes then how do I handle the formatting of the grid. What happens in such cases is:- lets say we have 4 columns ABCD we have some formatting for them saved in xml by the user. Now we have changed column B to E. Then the default formatting which I apply just before loading the layout is lost for the column E. And if I do the default formatting after loading then the user's formatting is overridden. So how do approach it.
The other problem is when I am applying formatting on the grid then the datafilters on editors in columns are disabled and the data is not filtered. I have tried to handle it by assigning the datafilter after loading the layout but this causes it modify the data just after loading the grid which is visible if there is very large data.
I'm afraid you lost me on both counts. If the column does not exist in the grid once you load that layout into the grid, then what's the problem? There's no need to remove it - it won't be there, anyway.
Also... I don't understand what you mean about an exception. Why would there be an exception? What kind of exception are you expecting?