Hello Damian,

I have retested the updated Sample, which Elena has uploaded and works fine on my configuration with v. 13.1.20131.2107 of NetAdvantage. I have tested it with five columns and offsets from 4 till 7 in several browsers
(Chrome, Firefox, IE10, IE9 and IE8) like the following:

rightEdgeDelta = rightEdgeDelta + 4;
leftEdgeDelta = leftEdgeDelta + 4;
brw = brw + 4;

When the resizing arrow was visible, no column moving behavior appeared.
Using offset of 3 and lower however, visually exposes the moving behavior, instead of column resizing when the resizing arrow is still visible.
The custom approach suggested, seems to expose enough flexibility to manipulate the offset, so different offset values could be used for every specific case. This behavior is not considered as a defect respectively no fixing is planned.
I suggest if you have the possibility, that you send a concrete CodeSample with the scenario you describe, so I could have a closer look at it.

Thank you for posting in the community.

This is still causing us significant problems, regardless of the values we put into the override function. We are now using 13.1.20131.2107.

Has there been any development or any hope of a proper fix?

Thanks.

I did try different values but was unable to get it any better.

Regards.

Hello JJB,

I was just wondering did you have a chance to try my suggestion. If you still need any assistance on the matter, please do not hesitate to ask.

Hello JJB,

The only thing that I changed in our original resizing behavior is the following lines:

  //This here can be modified. I'm going to add 4px offset. The area in which the two headed arrow shows will be smaller.

                    var rightEdgeDelta = Math.abs(windowScrollLeft + evnt.clientX - (elemBounds.x + elemBounds.width));

                    var leftEdgeDelta = Math.abs(windowScrollLeft + evnt.clientX - elemBounds.x);

                    rightEdgeDelta = rightEdgeDelta + 4;

                    leftEdgeDelta = leftEdgeDelta + 4;

                  brw=  brw + 4;

Therefore I could suggest you try different values of the offset (I set it to 4 still another value any be more suitable for your case).

Please let me know if you need any further details on the matter.