Hi tech guru's,
I am using the infragistics 8.1, which is a recent version. I am implementing the webschedular for my project.
In my case, I have a database structure which is quite different from what is provided for the webschedular as example, I have a different set of field names. So, I started with building my custom webschedulesqlclientprovider for my custom stored procedures. But the functionality of my webschedular is similar to what is provided or meant for.
I am trying to understand, what are the objects am I supposed to customize, Should I customize only the webschedulesqlclientprovider or should I customize the
If I have to customize the webschedulesqlclientprovider only, where can I define which stored procedure it is supposed to use.What is the step by step process?
Please let me know if there are any sample code that is provided.Note: I tried the article "Creating a custom data provider" in the infragistics help.
I created a project as defined in the above article, but could not figure out how to move forward from there.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
ThanksSai
I ithnk it is great that peple with direct connections can do this, but I think most people should abstract their SQL layer or DataAccess layer from the control.
pnasci said: DEAD LINKS
DEAD LINKS
Updated links for my replies to this thread are:
WebSchedule Data Modelhttp://help.infragistics.com/Help/NetAdvantage/ASPNET/2009.2/CLR3.5/html/WebSchedule_Data_Model.htmlDeveloper's Guide / Controls / ASP.NET / WebSchedule / Using the WebSchedule Controls and Components / Data ModelWebSchedule Stored Procedureshttp://help.infragistics.com/Help/NetAdvantage/ASPNET/2009.2/CLR3.5/html/WebSchedule_Overview_of_the_Stored_Procedures_Used_by_the_WebSchedule_Data_Providers.htmlDeveloper's Guide / Controls / ASP.NET / WebSchedule / Using the WebSchedule Controls and Components / Stored ProceduresDataBindings do not affect stored procedures, in the WebSchedule section ofhttp://help.infragistics.com/Help/NetAdvantage/ASPNET/2009.2/CLR3.5/html/Known_Issues_Known_Issues.htmlDeveloper's Guide / Known Issues and Breaking Changes / Known Issues
These URLs will ultimately go-away as new volumes and ASP.NET 4.0 are released, so I've also listed where they can be located in the help's table of contents.
tbird said: This is unacceptable and we will migrate to a better tool that provides simple dynamic databinding for the elements we choose to use.
This is unacceptable and we will migrate to a better tool that provides simple dynamic databinding for the elements we choose to use.
Hi
Could you name this tool?
Thank you a lot for help.
Andriy Zhornyk
I must say this is a pathetic model. We have a complex sql database and utilize the windows dayview and bind to our data model easily. Now, as we look at the web your tool requres we either re-tool our model to fit yours or attempt to create a lot of code behind to mimic your anticipated data model. This is unacceptable and we will migrate to a better tool that provides simple dynamic databinding for the elements we choose to use. Please let us know if you decide to change this model in the future as it may allow us to use your tools for our web side development.