I noticed that the field associated with the ValuePath seems to affect that size of the TreeMapNode.
According to the documentation ValuePath -> property Gets or sets the value path. It is the name of the property which is bound to the value of the treemap item.
But Value is normally associated with the key to an item. I believe it should not be used to control the size of the TreemapNode. Is there another property that can be used or some code behind to control this. I was hoping there was something like a SizeMapper.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
I realized this aftrer the post.
I guess I was expecting a mapper to control the size of the nodes. It is doing as expected.
Thanks
rtom,
Can you provide some more information about what you want to accomplish.
The ValuePath property of the NodeBinder is the one that determines the value of the treemap node. The purpose of a treemap is to represent values by the size of the corresponding node. If one needs to represent a different dimension of the data he or she could map it to the color, fontsize, border thickness, etc using a value mapper.