iam currently using Infragistics35.WebUI.UltraWebGrid.v9.2, Version=9.2 classic grid. when i multi-select aprox 100 rows is so slow.
Whenever i attempt to Multi-select the entire set of rows (selecting the first row, scrolling to the bottom of the grid, and then shift-clicking the last row), it takes a very long time. I assume this is because of the client-side script that is running to select all the rows. Is there anything that I can do to make this process faster?
Hi,
We are using Infragistics35.WebUI.UltraWebGrid in .net application. While selecting more cells in the grid, it is becoming very very slow. This was observed in IE8.
We have licensed version of Infragistics. Could you please give some work around to fix the issue?
The links which you provided in earlier versions are not opening and I am not able to get proper fix for the same.
Hello Martin,
I am following up to see if you need any further questions with this matter.
Bhadresh
I have tested this bahavior with ultraWebGrid as well as WebDataGrid. I was able to see that the performance is as expected with WebDataGrid when selecting more than 200 rows. As such I would recoomend you to use WebDataGrid.
The following link will give you more details on WebDataGrid:
<http://help.infragistics.com/NetAdvantage/ASPNET/2009.2/CLR3.5/?page=Web_WebDataGrid_WebDataGrid.html>
Let me know if you need any further assistance.
hi sdowdra, thanks for your reply but
>XML Load on Demand, this helps by breaking down your data and sending it to the client in piecesbut this does'nt solve my problem. because of i need to display all the rows directly (aprox. 200 ) i cannot work with load on demand or paging. the display of the data is not my problem. i have problems with selecting many rows.
Hello Martin, UltraWebGrid performance could be improved by applying our built in functionality. Please see documentation link below for more information regarding this.
http://help.infragistics.com/NetAdvantage/ASPNET/2010.1/CLR3.5/?page=WebGrid_Performance.html
Hope this helps.
Thank you,
Swetha