Hello ,
we have been automating .Net application using QTP 10. but some of the infragistics controls are not
getting recognized by the QTP. some of the objects with NetAdvantageTM 2005 Vol. 3 CLR 2.0 version
embeded into the application. We knew that Test Advantage of yours will solve our problem,
Still, I would like to know few details from you,
a) Do you have supported Test Advantage for NetAdvantageTM 2005 Vol. 3 CLR 2.0.?
b) If Yes, Can we get trail and licensed version to verify it on the application and Will this support QTP 10 version.
Your feedback will help us to go further.
Regards
Chary Chelloji
Thanks for your responses.
Chary,
There is a know issue with installer for older versions of TestAdvantage that were released before QTP 9.5. You will face this issue as TestAdvantage 2005 Vol 3 falls into this category.
You can find more information and a solution for the installer issue here: http://community.infragistics.com/forums/p/15955/159446.aspx#159446
Regards,
Ammar
Hi Chary,
With how QuickTest Professional is designed, to have comprehensive support for custom controls similar to our NetAdvantage for Windows Forms control, you need to have proxies designed to interface with it.
This is the essense of what TestAdvantage is, they are custom proxies designed for each release of NetAdvantage so that you can interface seemlessly with QuickTest Professional. We have TestAdvantage QuickTest Professional proxies for Windows Forms controls as far back as the 2004 Volume 3 release. So to answer your question, yes we do have support for 2005 Volume 3 CLR 2.0.
As to your second question, in regards to getting trial versions. To get trial versions that far back you will need to contact our sales department. sales@infragistics.com . As to second part of your second question, if it will support QuickTest Professional 10, while I have not specifically tested 2005 Volume 3 with QuickTest Professional 10, as the release dates were over four years apart. QuickTest Professional has proven to be backwards compatible with all of our proxies to date, so it is my belief that it should work fine.